Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Campus Update
Case Report
Case Series
Concept Paper
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Journal Watch
Medi-Quiz
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Campus Update
Case Report
Case Series
Concept Paper
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Journal Watch
Medi-Quiz
Original Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
11 (
1
); 27-29

Management of CBD stones-a comparative study of ERCP guided CBD stone removal and open surgery

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, B.J.M.C and Civil Hospital, Ahmadabad
Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, B.J.M.C and Civil Hospital, Ahmadabad
3rd year Resident, Department of General Surgery, B.J.M.C and Civil Hospital, Ahmadabad

*Corresponding Author: Dr. Rajnish Patel Email: drrainishpatel@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Background & Objectives:

To review the patients who underwent open surgery or endoscopy for common bile duct stone removal. To compare the efficacy of open surgery versus endoscopy in terms of achievement of common bile duct clearance with respect to the size of the stone, to compare the efficacy in terms of achievement of regression of symptoms, signs and biochemical parameters and post operative complications and incidence of mortality.

Material and Method:

This is a prospective study of management of 40 cases of CBD stones, performed in the Surgery Department of Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad.

Result:

Open surgery is better than ERCP in terms of improvement of symptoms and lab parameters (95%>80%), morbidity and duct clearance (95%>80%).

Conclusion:

Open surgery is more efficacious than ERCP in terms of achievement of common bile duct clearance, safer than ERCP in terms of minor morbidity, in terms of achievement of regression of symptoms, signs and biochemical parameters for common bile duct calculi. Open surgery and ERCP are comparable in terms of major morbidity. ERCP is safer than open surgery in terms of incidence of mortality.

Keywords

Open surgery
ERCP
CBD stones

Fulltext Views
50

PDF downloads
29
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections