Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Original Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Original Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
13 (
2
); 50-57

Evaluation of Patient’s Perspective Regarding Usage of Post Partum Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device (PPIUCD) at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S C L Hospital, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S C L Hospital, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad
Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S C L Hospital, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad
Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S C L Hospital, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad
Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S C L Hospital, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad

*Corresponding Author: Dr Kavyakumari S Patel Email: rvtpds@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Background and Aims:

Despite many advantages of post partum intra uterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD), it generally suffers from unpopularity either because of ignorance or fear of associated side effects and inadequate knowledge. This study was aimed to determine proportion of women accepting PPIUCD, to assess knowledge, and attitude toward contraception and to determine and analyze reasons for refusal of PPIUCD.

Material and Methods:

After permission from Institutional Review Board, this prospective study was carried out over a period of 2 months. Patients who refused PPIUCD were enrolled after taking written informed consent. A questionnaire was administered to assess their socio-demographic profile, knowledge, attitude and acceptability of various family planning methods and reasons for refusal of PPIUCD.

Results:

Majority of the patients (99, 47.6%) were in age group of 20-24 years and 96 (46.1%) had primary education. Only 7 (3.3 %) were employed. PPIUCD was denied under family pressure and due to worries about side effects in 58 (27.8%) cases each. PPIUCD was denied as 44 (21.1%) patients wanted to use other type of contraception, 34 (16.3%) were scared and 23(10.7%) had misconceptions regarding PPIUCD.

Conclusions:

Counseling for postpartum contraception should start from antenatal period and should include information, and correction of myths associated with PPIUCD. Not only the woman but counseling of family members should be done as they play major role in deciding whether the woman should use any contraception or not. Education status and occupation play a direct role in women’s decision regarding use of contraception. Hence, education and empowerment of women should be promoted.

Keywords

Contraception
family planning

Fulltext Views
4

PDF downloads
2
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections