Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Campus Update
Case Report
Case Series
Concept Paper
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Journal Watch
Medi-Quiz
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Campus Update
Case Report
Case Series
Concept Paper
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Journal Watch
Medi-Quiz
Original Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
11 (
1
); 9-12

Effects of Temporalis fascia and Cartilage island graft in type 1 tympanoplasty

Associate Professor & Head of unit, E.N.T. Department, B.J. Medical College, Civil hospital, Ahmedabad.
Senior Resident, E.N.T. Department, B.J. Medical College, Civil hospital, Ahmedabad.
Third year resident, E.N.T. Department, B.J. Medical College, Civil hospital, Ahmedabad.
Visiting Consultant, E.N.T. Department, B.J. Medical College, Civil hospital, Ahmedabad.

*Corresponding Author: Dr. Dhwani Mehta Email: dhwanim4@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Our objective of the study was to compare the outcomes of type 1 tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia and cartilage island graft, which was done in a tertiary hospital as a prospective study.

Materials & method:

Out of 80 patients, 40 underwent tympanic membrane repair using temporalis fascia as the graft while in the other group, tragal cartilage was used. Patients having >50 % perforation of tympanic membrane, a dry ear for > 1 month, and intact ossicular chain with pure conductive hearing loss were included in the study. Result: At 9 months follow up, the graft uptake was 90 % for temporalis fascia and 97.5 % for cartilage island graft. There was no significant difference in post-operative hearing between the two groups.

Conclusion:

Graft take up rate is higher when cartilage island graft is used. There is a significant improvement in hearing status using both temporalis facia graft and cartilage island graft but no significant difference when the two are compared..

Keywords

Cartilage
Hearing
Temporalis fascia
Tympanoplasty

Fulltext Views
43

PDF downloads
34
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections