Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Campus Update
Case Report
Case Series
Concept Paper
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Journal Watch
Medi-Quiz
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Campus Update
Case Report
Case Series
Concept Paper
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Journal Watch
Medi-Quiz
Original Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
9 (
2
); 26-31

Comparison between cytological & histological grading of Breast cancer and its role in prognosis.

Resident Doctor, Department of Pathology, P. D. U. Government Medical College, Rajkot.
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, P. D. U. Government Medical College, Rajkot.
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, P. D. U. Government Medical College, Rajkot.
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, P. D. U. Government Medical College, Rajkot.
Professor & Head, Department of Pathology, P. D. U. Government Medical College, Rajkot.

*Corresponding Author: Dr Amita Chavda E-mail: camita3030@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Aim:

To find out utility of grading breast carcinoma on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as per the criteria proposed by Robinson and Colleagues and compare it with histological grading based on Nottingham’s modification of Bloom and Richardson system, proposed by Elston and Ellis.

Methods:

Cytological smears of 24 cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and later on confirmed on histopathology, were graded according to the Robinson grading system. The histological grade as per Nottingham’s modification of Bloom and Richardson system, proposed by Elston and Ellis was also decided in all 24 cases. The cytological grade was compared with the histological grade to know the concordance rate.

Results:

Out of 24 cases 9 cases were cytologically grade I, while 15 were grade II. Overall concordance between Cytological grade and histological grade was 79.17%.

Conclusion:

Cytology grading proposed by Robinson and colleagues can be a useful parameter for preoperative prognostication in cases of carcinoma of breast and selected cases requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Keywords

Breast carcinoma
Cytological grading
Fine needle aspiration
Histological grading

Fulltext Views
45

PDF downloads
31
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections